As Daniel Wallach of the Athletic reported on Thursday, Williamson filed a lawsuit against Prime Sports Marketing and Gina Ford in North Carolina. The defendents in the case have supplied what they claim is "newly discovered evidence" to show the October 2018 payment to Williamson and his stepfather actually took place. Witness Donald Kreiss signed a 38-page affidavit alongside a copy of an alleged marketing agreement between Williamson and Canada's Maxiumum Management Group.
As a result of this, Gina Ford's lawyers have indicated they are seeking a summary judgment based on the alleged new evidence.
Williamson's attorney Jeffrey S. Klein has responded to the supposed new evidence in a statement. "The alleged 'agreements' and driver's license attached to these papers are fradulent," Klein said, "and neither Mr. Williamson nor his family know these individuals nor had any dealings with them. We had previously alerted Ms. Ford's lawyers to both this fact and that we had previously reported the documents to law enforcement as rogeries, but they chose to go ahead with another frivolous filing anyway."
"This is a desperate and irresponsible attempt to smear Mr. Williamson at the very time he has the opportunity to live his dream of playing professional basketball," Klein continued.
One fan who claims to collect Zion Williamson autographs said the signature in the alleged evidence is in "no way" the same as the real deal.
Williamson's lawsuit against Prime Sports Marketing and Gina Ford is an attempt to nullify the agreement under a law in the state of North Carolina that protects student-athletes from non-certified agents, Bleacher Report noted.
Zion signed with Prime shortly after he was selected as the No. 1 overall draft pick by the Pelicans during the 2019 NBA draft, but he switched to Creative Artists Agency shortly after. The company filed a lawsuit against him in the state of Florida seeking compensation for any of his endorsement opportunities it helped line up before he switched to CAA. Ford has argued that Williamson accepted "benefits" while at Duke, and if proven it could result in him being ruled ineligible retroactively, making his case all the more difficult to win.