Jack Dorsey Announces Twitter's Ban on Political Advertisements

Twitter's CEO explained the move in a series of tweets Wednesday: "This isn’t about free expression. This is about paying for reach."

Jack Dorsey
Getty

Image via Getty/Amal KS/Hindustan Times

Jack Dorsey

Twitter will no longer run political advertisements, CEO Jack Dorsey announced Wednesday. 

We’ve made the decision to stop all political advertising on Twitter globally. We believe political message reach should be earned, not bought. Why? A few reasons…🧵

— jack (@jack) October 30, 2019

"A political message earns reach when people decide to follow an account or retweet. Paying for reach removes that decision, forcing highly optimized and targeted political messages on people. We believe this decision should not be compromised by money," Dorsey wrote in a series of tweets that explained the decision. "While internet advertising is incredibly powerful and very effective for commercial advertisers, that power brings significant risks to politics, where it can be used to influence votes to affect the lives of millions."

The ban, which goes into effect Nov. 22, will reportedly target political-based advertisements as well as issue-based ads; however the Twitter CEO claimed there will be "a few exceptions," such as ads for voter registration. The company is expected to share the final policy on Nov. 15.

Dorsey went on to say that the decision will also help Twitter maintain credibility, as it has made a commitment to combatting the spread of disinformation, "For instance, it's not credible for us to say: 'We’re working hard to stop people from gaming our systems to spread misleading info, buuut if someone pays us to target and force people to see their political ad…well...they can say whatever they want!" he tweeted along with a wink emoji.

Though Dorsey did not mention the names of any other social media giants, many suspected the credibility tweet was directed at Facebook, which is facing mounting backlash over its policies regarding political ads.

A number of lawmakers have blasted Facebook for allowing misleading and false political ads on its platform, as well as its refusal to fact check said ads. 

"Our approach is grounded in Facebooks fundamental belief in free expression, respect for the democratic process, and the belief that, in mature democracies with a free press, political speech is already arguably the most scrutinized speech there is," Katie Harbath, Facebook's public policy director for global elections, told The Verge. "Thus, when a politician speaks or makes an ad, we do not send it to third party fact checkers."

Thousands of users have praised Twitter for the ban, with many calling on Facebook to follow suit:

This is the right thing to do for democracy in America and all over the world.

What say you, @Facebook? https://t.co/dRgipKHzUG

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) October 30, 2019

Wow. Big move by @jack, and a bigger contrast to @Facebook's increasingly problematic policy positions. https://t.co/nm9rckaKHc

— Edward Snowden (@Snowden) October 30, 2019

Pretty interesting move. You can either allow all political ads (don't get into nit picking and "fact checking" them) or you can ban all of them. Basically I think this is one of the only two reasonable ways to go. https://t.co/rHE8aELKuo

— Secular Talk🎙 (@KyleKulinski) October 30, 2019

The right move @jack. Your turn, Facebook. https://t.co/eKuRD2bxvN

— Scott Galloway (@profgalloway) October 30, 2019

You can read Dorsey's full announcement below.

We’ve made the decision to stop all political advertising on Twitter globally. We believe political message reach should be earned, not bought. Why? A few reasons…🧵

— jack (@jack) October 30, 2019

A political message earns reach when people decide to follow an account or retweet. Paying for reach removes that decision, forcing highly optimized and targeted political messages on people. We believe this decision should not be compromised by money.

— jack (@jack) October 30, 2019

While internet advertising is incredibly powerful and very effective for commercial advertisers, that power brings significant risks to politics, where it can be used to influence votes to affect the lives of millions.

— jack (@jack) October 30, 2019

Internet political ads present entirely new challenges to civic discourse: machine learning-based optimization of messaging and micro-targeting, unchecked misleading information, and deep fakes. All at increasing velocity, sophistication, and overwhelming scale.

— jack (@jack) October 30, 2019

These challenges will affect ALL internet communication, not just political ads. Best to focus our efforts on the root problems, without the additional burden and complexity taking money brings. Trying to fix both means fixing neither well, and harms our credibility.

— jack (@jack) October 30, 2019

For instance, it‘s not credible for us to say: “We’re working hard to stop people from gaming our systems to spread misleading info, buuut if someone pays us to target and force people to see their political ad…well...they can say whatever they want! 😉”

— jack (@jack) October 30, 2019

We considered stopping only candidate ads, but issue ads present a way to circumvent. Additionally, it isn’t fair for everyone but candidates to buy ads for issues they want to push. So we're stopping these too.

— jack (@jack) October 30, 2019

We’re well aware we‘re a small part of a much larger political advertising ecosystem. Some might argue our actions today could favor incumbents. But we have witnessed many social movements reach massive scale without any political advertising. I trust this will only grow.

— jack (@jack) October 30, 2019

In addition, we need more forward-looking political ad regulation (very difficult to do). Ad transparency requirements are progress, but not enough. The internet provides entirely new capabilities, and regulators need to think past the present day to ensure a level playing field.

— jack (@jack) October 30, 2019

We’ll share the final policy by 11/15, including a few exceptions (ads in support of voter registration will still be allowed, for instance). We’ll start enforcing our new policy on 11/22 to provide current advertisers a notice period before this change goes into effect.

— jack (@jack) October 30, 2019

A final note. This isn’t about free expression. This is about paying for reach. And paying to increase the reach of political speech has significant ramifications that today’s democratic infrastructure may not be prepared to handle. It’s worth stepping back in order to address.

— jack (@jack) October 30, 2019

Latest in Life