Critically Panned ‘Winnie-the-Pooh: Bloody and Honey’ Proves to Be a Horror Hit

The reviews were not kind for the childhood-ruining slasher, which is believed to have been made for an extremely low budget of $100,000 or less.

View this video on YouTube

There’s a rumbly in a surprising number of tumblies.

As it turns out, ruthlessly ruining childhoods while garnering negative reviews can prove to be a path to success, as evident in the box office performance of Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey. According to Deadline, the film (made possible thanks to the original A.A. Milne shorts having entered the public domain) brought in about $1.6 million in the U.S. during its first week in theaters.

Looking at the global numbers, per Box Office Mojo, Blood and Honey has brought in $1.1 million, bringing the worldwide total to $2.7 million at the time of this writing. Of course, if this were Avatar or Ant-Man we were talking about, these hauls would not be viewed as victories. But Blood and Honey, notably, is a low-budget independent production. In fact, as Entertainment Weekly reported this month, the film’s budget is believed to have been less than $100,000.

In other words, Blood and Honey is already a hit. At least it is commercially speaking, as critics have largely panned the film, which led to its current Metacritic score of 17

As expected, a Blood and Honey sequel has already been confirmed to be on the way. Rhys Frake-Waterfield, who directed the first one, told EW this month that he’s aiming for a substantially higher budget this time around. Securing more money, the writer/director explained, would help the next entry compete with decidedly higher-budget fare. 

On that latter front, horror fans have much to look forward to in the months ahead, including the latest entry in the consistently strong Scream franchise.

Latest in Pop Culture