Neil deGrasse Tyson Criticized for 'Incredibly Insensitive' Tweet About Mass Shootings

Tyson later issued an attempted clarification on the tweet, which saw him argue that emotions "respond more to spectacle than to data."

tyson
Getty

Image via Getty/Craig Barritt

tyson

Neil deGrasse Tyson's usually playful habit of pointing out stats in connection with a world event took a wrong turn Sunday.

As the nation was engaging in its sadly familiar debate over gun safety measures following mass shootings in Texas and Ohio over the weekend, Tyson noted that "the USA horrifically lost 34 people to mass shootings" in a 48-hour period, before comparing that number to other death-related statistics.

"Often our emotions respond more to spectacle than to data," Tyson said in the tweet, which was shared Sunday afternoon and remained live at the time of this writing.

In the past 48hrs, the USA horrifically lost 34 people to mass shootings.

On average, across any 48hrs, we also lose…

500 to Medical errors
300 to the Flu
250 to Suicide
200 to Car Accidents
40 to Homicide via Handgun

Often our emotions respond more to spectacle than to data.

— Neil deGrasse Tyson (@neiltyson) August 4, 2019

Tyson's message was quickly condemned, with multiple people pointing out the faulty comparisons as well as the tone-deaf timing.

You know what is spectacle? This fucking tweet! How dare you post this when bodies are just arriving at the morgue today in El Paso and Dayton.

This is an incredibly insensitive tweet. I almost didnt think it was real.

— Koko ✊🏼✊🏽✊🏿 (@Kokomothegreat) August 5, 2019

To call this disappointing from someone as smart as @neiltyson is a massive understatement. Can we not strive for fewer medical errors AND fewer mass shootings at the same time? Can we not want a better flu shot AND fewer gun deaths?

Be better than this, Neil. https://t.co/SIFAmPTSR7

— Doc Bastard (@DocBastard) August 5, 2019

The problem with this tweet is that it isn't a good point. It's whataboutism. It's dismissing the problem. Humanity can focus on more than one problem at a time. And, at least for me, people intentionally killing others for their ethnicity or religion is a far worse offense.

— TriteHexagon (@TriteHexagon) August 5, 2019

"So if you are one of those people, I apologize for not knowing in advance what effect my Tweet could have on you." LOL, my favorite type of apology. Im sorry you felt offended but not that I did what offended you. Nice Neil.

— Will Mac (@Evollove19Mac) August 5, 2019

In an extended statement shared early Monday, Tyson clarified his intentions behind the original tweet, stating his goal was to "offer objectively true information" in the conversations surrounding preventable ways of dying.

"Where I miscalculated was that I genuinely believed the Tweet would be helpful to anyone trying to save lives in America," Tyson said, in part. "What I learned from the range of reactions is that for many people, some information—my Tweet in particular—can be true but unhelpful, especially at a time when many people are either still in shock, or trying to heal—or both. So if you are one of those people, I apologize for not knowing in advance what effect my Tweet could have on you."

The apology statement has since also been criticized.

Twenty people were killed at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas Saturday when a 21-year-old white man opened fire with an assault-style rifle. Sunday, nine people were killed by a gunman in Dayton, Ohio in a separate mass shooting.

Latest in Life