Starbucks Sued for Allegedly Exposing People to Deadly Pesticide in Manhattan Stores

Be careful where you get your coffee from.

starbucks hong kong coffee
Getty

Image via Getty/ Budrul Chukrut/SOPA Images/LightRocket

starbucks hong kong coffee

After a Game of Thrones gaffe gave Starbucks (potentially) billions in free publicity, the coffeehouse chain is back in the news again, though this time not for something as positive.

The Blastreports that a lawsuit was filed against the company, accusing Starbucks of using pesticides containing chemicals harmful to humans in the stores for years. Court documents contain statements from a former employee and two pest control workers, who claim the compamy "has for years permitted the deployment of toxic chemicals in its stores, which infused not only the food products and fixtures, but also the very air circulated throughout its retail locations in Manhattan." At this time, it is unclear how many stores are affected.

Wigdor LLP has filed a consumer class action lawsuit alleging that @Starbucks stores throughout Manhattan have been contaminated with the highly toxic pesticide Dichlorvos ("DDVP"), which is harmful to humans and unfit for use in proximity to food, beverages or people. pic.twitter.com/5biWFzwWI7

— WigdorLaw (@WigdorLaw) May 21, 2019

Wigdor LLP, a law firm based in NYC, has filed a putative consumer class action suit against Starbucks. The firm's website details the suit, which alleges several stores "throughout Manhattan have been permeated with a toxic pesticide call Dichlorvos (2,2-dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate or “DDVP”), which is highly poisonous and unfit for use in proximity to food, beverages and people."

DDVP is an active ingredient in Hot Shot No-Pest Strips, which are said to be found in many stores, despite warnings from experts. Wigdor LLP's website contains several pictures of the product in stores, many close to the food. They claim Starbucks has been made aware of the danger, but failed to take action.

In addition, a report from NY1 indicates that a second lawsuit has been filed, in which three individuals claimed to have been fired after making complaints about the threat.

Latest in Life