Twitter Reacts to the New York Times Calling Michael Brown “No Angel”

A New York Times profile of Michael Brown calling him "no angel" has sparked serious outrage across Twitter.

Not Available Lead
Complex Original

Image via Complex Original

Not Available Lead

This morning is the funeral for Michael Brown, the African-American teenager gunned down in Ferguson, Mo. by white police officer Darren Wilson on August 9. A profile of Brown in today’s New York Times says that the 18-year-old “was no angel,” citing the following reasons:


  • “He lived in a community that had rough patches”

  • “He dabbled in drugs and alcohol”

  • “He had taken to rapping in recent months, producing lyrics that were by turns contemplative and vulgar”

  • “He got into at least one scuffle with a neighbor”

In other words, he sounds like a very normal 18-year-old boy. The implication that these things somehow led to—or even justified—Brown being killed by a police officer is as insane as it is offensive to his memory. To run a piece like this (which to be fair does discuss the positive aspects of his life as well) on the day of his funeral likewise seems very disrespectful and distracts from the sadness of burying a young man who should be getting ready to go to college.

The dangerous implication that Brown’s relatively typical teenage boundary pushing somehow meant that he brought his death on himself has upset a huge swath of readers, who have taken to Twitter to voice their displeasure in both powerful and clever ways:

[via NYT]

Latest in Pop Culture