Even putting aside the fact that purple eyes are neat, Phil Noto's cover for Batgirl #3 is just a sharp, eye-catching portrait, and also has the added benefit of not revealing Batgirl's current (and reasonably godawful) costume. Plus, a close-up shot of eyes made a nice counterpoint to Noto's previous two covers, which focused on Batgirl's breasts and legs, respectively. Turns out her eyes really ARE up there. —SIMS





Anonymous December 15th, 2009 at 10:41 AM
...how could you not see that Two-Face and The Scarecrow are in there as well???
December 15th, 2009 at 02:26 PM
yeah, def see scarecrow and two-face in there
December 15th, 2009 at 03:16 PM
Too much Marvel crap. No Quitely Batman covers? No Reis? Sorry, but FAIL.
December 15th, 2009 at 04:49 PM
Thanks for the spoiler warning on the Fables 82 cover, ass.
Dean December 15th, 2009 at 06:25 PM
But is he listening to Wagner?
Tapeleg December 15th, 2009 at 08:04 PM
And we know that art joke thanks to Understanding Comics by Scott McCloud.
Rich December 16th, 2009 at 02:17 AM
sometimes books you wouldn't touch with a diseased bargepole have good covers.
rich December 16th, 2009 at 02:20 AM
love the book hate this cover, for me its too messy with a strange use of colour
rich December 16th, 2009 at 02:23 AM
love the card hidden under the table, you really get the idea something is about to kick off !
Marc December 16th, 2009 at 02:24 AM
Best series ever, funniest stuff I've ever read. I would love to see and annual Planetary GUide