Did Justin Timberlake Do "20/20" Just So He Wouldn't Have to Pay Back a $5 Million Loan?

The Hollywood Reporter is reporting that may be the case.

Not Available Lead
Complex Original

Image via Complex Original

Not Available Lead

Justin Timberlake's return to music has been one of the biggest stories of 2013. Not just because he was a big star who took a seven year hiatus, came back with The 20/20 Experience, and sold extremely well, but because as recently as last year it seemed like JT would rather act than sing.

Suddenly, this January, Timberlake said he had a new album, went on an all-out marketing blitz, dropped said album, and is now slated to hit the road this summer with Jay-Z for the Legends of The Summer tour. Why the sudden change of heart? 

Well, The Hollywood Reporter has some theories. They're reporting that the reason JT put an album out was because of a deal he had with Live Nation which he had to make good on.  

According to multiple sources, a 2009 partnership with Timberlake, structured after Jay-Z's game-changing $150 million Live Nation 360 deal and Timberlake's AEG-promoted, $126 million-grossing 2007 FutureSex/LoveShow tour, was quid pro quo for a touring commitment to Live Nation. In exchange, Timberlake received about $20 million—$5 million of it free and clear, or "a gimme," as one insider describes it. (Worth noting: Timberlake could have returned it had he not toured.)

That's not all, the story theorizes the reason the album was made in 20 days was so there would be an album to go along with the tour. And the reason JT is teaming up with Jay-Z is because insiders were worried about whether or not Timberlake chould still fill stadiums up.

All in all, it just sounds like Timberlake's hand was forced and he opted to make some music instead of giving up $5 milllion dollars which might explain the lukewarm reception to the album. Still, we can't say we wouldn't do the same. Either way, we'll see what JT does on his next album.

[via The Hollywood Reporter]

Latest in Music